Reading
NEWS ITEM:
- IBM wants to build a 100,000-qubit quantum computer | MIT Technology Review
- Inside the quest for unbreakable encryption | MIT TechnologyReview
- This new startup built a record-breaking 256-qubit quantum computer MIT Technology Review (QuEra)
- NISQ Era 5 Years on: Quantum computing has a hype problem MIT Technology Review
HISTORY
- P. Feynman, Simulating Physics with Computers, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982)
- Haroche & J. M. Raimond, “Quantum Computing: Dream or Nightmare”, Physics Today, 49, 51 (1996)
- Monroe & D. J. Wineland, “Future of Quantum Computing Proves to Be Debatable”, Physics Today 49, 107 (1996)
MODERN PERSPECTIVES ON QUANTUM COMPUTING
- John Preskill, “Quantum Computing in the NISQ Era and Beyond”, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)
- Ivan Deutsch “Harnessing the Power of the Second Quantum Revolution”, PRX-Quantum 1, 020101 (2020)
- Google Quantum AI* “Suppressing Quantum Errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit”, Nature 614, 676 (2023).
- Arute et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor”, Nature 574, 461 (2019)
- Arute et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor”, Nature 574, 505 (2019)
- Arute et al, Supplementary Information
- Anderson et al. (Quantinuum) “Implementing Fault tolerant Entangling Gates on the Five-qubit Code and the Color Code”. ArXiv:2208.01863v1 [quant-ph] 3 Aug 2022
- “ Reglade et al. “Quantum Control of a cat qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds”, Nature 629, 778 (2024).
- Google AI Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit.
- Demonstrating real-time and low-latency quantum error correction with superconducting qubits, Rigetti Computing, October 8, 2024)
TUTORIALS ON ERROR CORRECTION
- Preskill’s Notes on error correction
- Introduction to quantum error correction and fault tolerance, Steven M. Girvin, Yale Quantum Institute.
THE EPR PARADOX, BELLS INEQUALITIES AND ASPECTS EXPERIMENTS
- Einsten, B. Podolsky & N. Rosen, “Can Quantum Mechanical description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?”, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
- Aspect, P. Grangier & G. Roger, “Experimental Test of Realistic Local Theories via Bell’s Theorem”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).
- Aspect, P. Grangier & G. Roger, “Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).
- Aspect, J. Dalibard & G. Roger, “Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).
- Hensen et al., “Loophole-freeBell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometes”, Nature 526, 682 (2015)
- Giustina et al., “Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell’s Theorem With Entangled Photons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015).
- K. Shalm et al., “strong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).
QUANTUM BAYESIANISM (QUBISM) AND QUANTUM STATES AS STATES OF KNOWLEDGE.
2012 NOBEL IN PHYSICS GOES TO SERGE HAROCHE AND DAVID WINELAND, WHOSE RESEARCH INSPIRED MODERN QIS.
POVM WITH PHOTONS AS QUBITS
- B. M. Clarke et al., “Experimental realization of optimal detection strategies for overcomplete states”, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012303 (2001)
- Schiavon, G. Vallone, and P. Villoresi, “Experimental realization of equiangular three-state quantum key distribution”, Scientific Reports 6, 30089 (2016)
POVMS AND COHERENT STATE DISCRIMINATION
- L. Cook, P. J. Martin, and J. M. Geremia, “Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement”, Nature 446, 774 (2007)
- E. Becerra, J. Fan, G. Baumgartner, J. Goldhar, and A. Migdall, “Experimental demonstration of a receiver beating the standard quantum limit formultiple nonorthogonal state discrimination”, Nature Photonics 7, 147 (2013)
QUANTUM COMPUTING VS AI